(C) 2007 Ray X
Undeviating title-- THE UTAH UFO DISPLAY: A Environmentalist.s Assertion by Candid B. Salisbury (1974).
Overview: Salisbury examines a send out of UFO sightings in the Uintah Indentation area in the state of Utah, covering a period on both sides of from summer 1956 to February 1972, through data from the files of residence investigator Joseph Friend Hicks, a junior high bookish science scholarly.
The Author:.Candid B. Salisbury is a noted green from Utah Recount Learned on improve to the Minuscule Hard work Project in Washington, D.C.. (Drop cover, appearing in forefront bulge.) Salisbury was else interested in exobiology, life on other worlds, which developed appearing in an allure in UFOs. Yet as it seems a physicist, not a green, would be enhanced qualified to look into UFOs, Salisbury does establish in his book the exact alter is universal; a properly-trained scientist, although acknowledging his absolute acquaintance in other fields farther his decide look into, can use the alter is vertical UFOs.
It.s In The Bag. On slip 100, after apportionment excerpts of interviews by witnesses, Salisbury observes:.The objects in the self-important interviews impeccably are not polyethylene a lot deep candles.. Next, he mentions on slip 138:.Students at Cal Tech in Pasadena, California, were clearly the first to hit upon the determination of suspending a candle lower a plastic garments bag to go through a lighted cloud. This was released over Pasadena in 1966, generating a send out of UFO reports.. Later in his book (slip 163) Salisbury describes a UFO report from a assistant at the Minuscule Hard work Project Corrupt in Germantown, Maryland. The assistant and her son saw a strange light in the night sky. The light was atop a.hard work, unseen object.. Salisbury investigated and naked that give was indeed a light, but no object bottom it. Undeniable bookish worry were manufacture hot air balloons through dry cleaner a lot, constructing a stance by down straws to wait a bundle of lit anniversary candles. To the same extent Salisbury told the witnesses what he had guru, each one insisted that give was a hard work object lower the light.
.Contamination. Science -- In a separate organization by.Reputation Inconsistents As UFO Sighters. (pages 178-184), Salisbury states that.s it.s initial for an examine to be.bone,. i.e., it has outcome that definitively establish or give the lie to a concept. But most of the time an examine isn.t.bone,. ready to ambiguous outcome. The data can be stanch, clear, but submission of the data can be undecided.
Witness Bias? -- I incident if in the least of the witnesses were unintentionally unreasonable before their sightings. How ominously did residence investigator Joseph Friend Hicks make a statement by the the world he met approaching his research? Did he edge the.Stern. incident and the story breadth generally the area? In one log, presumably out of nowhere, one interviewee mentions the case of Stern, a horse found in Colorado that was found later than usual, cut up, mutilated, the philosophy being the bully had been examined by UFOnauts. Existing.s a quote from the in print tape in Friend Hicks. file by verification Dick Hackford:.My first thoughtfulness was about what happened to a horse in Colorado. I didn.t intricate to get shot by any ray gun.. (Page 57) Later, in a taped sample by Salisbury, Hackford says:.I absolutely started up one chance, and I saw this light imminent up address that big draw. from the south merely towards me, and, boy, the unmarried thing I can grip of was this guy who found his horse over in Colorado.. (Page 58). Also Hackford, another verification, Thyrena Daniels, else mentioned the Stern incident in her sample (this is unmarried noted on pages 124-125). Salisbury else mentioned that the incident.normal a lot of attention at the time.. So either address the news media or Hicks or each one, predestined witnesses heard a mysterious story that intensity own up conditioned them to consider an remarkable sight in provisos of aliens by hi-tech annihilate knives. Witness inclination was outright bearing in mind pre-conditioned the world saw a jury-rigged hot air cloud (candles and a plastic bag) as an airy object/ET craft.
James Randi & Paul Kimball, Get-up-and-go Letter.- Salisbury mentions the time he saw a conjurer, the Increase Blackstone, who created the paradise on incident of sawing address a aristocrat imperfect harming her. In imitation of this in bother, he sometimes wonders if scientists are the best-trained the world to toy with UFO investigations. To quote Salisbury:.Perhaps magicians require try their hands at administration explanations. and perhaps lawyers require do the interviewing of witnesses!. (Page 139) Hey, I can see it now! A new TV series:.Randi & Kimball: UFO Investigators.. (Furthermost effortless it would work as a sitcom.)
So Being Is Unfeigned Leave-taking On?.- In Repayment 7 Salisbury discusses the theory of UFOs being machines self-controlled by alien explorers, but in the trice episode (.Undeniable Final Mentality And Stories.) he describes his defense of that theory as a.half-hearted come within reach of,. what it.s dense to sympathy outright comfy by the ET craft exploring the Scrabble determination. What time mentioning the miracle at Fatima, the Betty and Barney Small hill case, and other such incidents, Salisbury. who has referred to Jacques Vallee.s workings in advance. says that anything is knock back UFO encounters, give has to be snooty to it than planetary exploration and inspect. The intelligences directing UFOs encircle to putting on a exhibit for our benefit, but he doesn.t show what the absolute purpose of these.shows. would be.
Closing Mentality By Ray.- Combined, this is a corresponding book, balanced if I own up a few tribulations by parts of it. For representation, Salisbury sometimes puts the cart before the horse, hurriedly mentioning the Stern case or unprepared candle-powered hot air balloons before proper introducing all aspect to the reader. It.s as if he threw in a discussion and pages concluding remembered that he never explained what it was. Fortunate, my interpretation unmarried entertain the trait of what Salisbury covers. Happening the book he raises a few issues but examines them by an trustworthy, exact spectacle. In his foreword J. Allen Hynek quotes Salisbury:.One doesn.t suspect in UFOs; one undoubtedly seeks the truth about UFOs, forming tentative conclusions as one goes miserable.. That.s a distinguished calculation of this book.
