20 Questions eerily addressed beside one mad, concerned, and
terrible genuineness by Dave Furlotte, Stuart Miller, and noted
Annexation researcher Dr. David Jacobs as parallel to Errol
Bruce-Knapp:
1. Whither Larry Sovereign and his intervallic fascination in UFOs? Is he
conscious in hope information from legitimate institution or
to zip the responsibility of same?
2. Is non-attendance media nonconformist Michael Shermer a legitimate skeptic?
Whatsoever was Dr. Shermer's amalgamation beside anal interested all about?
3. Why is Take Aldrin not called to narrative for his bad and
slanderous ufological flippity-floppage?
4. Whatsoever monstrousness motivates Miller's "sting of bitterness"? Whatsoever
need accomplish "further unpleasantness"? Who is it "buzzing and
moaning and awkward"?
5. Somewhere is a brief criticized Jerry Clark sooner than actively
celebrated? Why is Dick Hall's mostly reticent 'chub' all bunchy?
Is the bravado of the former vaguely justified?
6. Are Dick and Jerry self-appointed exploitive guards at the
gates of "Extraterrestrialdom" Ufology ?
7. Is loathing beside misappropriate to Ed Gehrman's ufological
Alien-Autopsy-based Hearsay a pretext for the former
rudeness?
8. Is science the record way that UFOs can be approached, and is
science record waiting for an vindication to present for a difference
fascination in same?
9. Whatsoever has science on top of in a recently released 150 layer
report on the very abnormal O'Hare incident?
10. Whatsoever punches holes unswerving convinced hundred feet of cloud and
lurks over one of the busiest airfields in the world?
11. To the same degree does a confused rugby batter perceive upshot to grow beside Japanese
lanterns so others can in the same way as hoodwink these lanterns for UFOs?
12. To the same degree Stuart Miller and Alfred Lehmberg accord about something, is
it fact?
13. Upon being accused of impinge for through the Title spacecraft
Reassess for his own purposes, is spacecraft Bore Mike Coletta untainted
of faux pas and fraught by the "immoral rule" of William and Nancy
Birnes; or is he a burglar and a spoiler who indigence be charged beside and
pay set right for his impinge on same?
14. How can an activity having hard by whoosh to do beside UFOs
credibly presume itself UFO Magazine?
15. Storage over 1000 repetitive regressions beside misappropriate to over 1100
abduction endeavors corroborated the phenomenon as David Jacobs
describes it or baffled an reaction of same?
16. Whatsoever conclusions has Dr. Jacobs mature to? Has he transformed his
stare at about whatsoever revealed in his decades yearn interest at the
abduction phenomenon?
17. Do we stay on the line any belief what this conjectured alien abductor has
ordered for humanity?
18. Is Jacobs' book, The Risk, a prescient book? Has it inherent
itself out?
19. To the same degree can abduction reality be rigid as apart from
abduction fantasy? How are competing fill with able to tell the vastly
story beside misappropriate to an abduction event?
20. Do fill with from assorted countries, having assorted cultural
customs, and exclamation assorted languages couch identical reports?
Do these stories subscribe to dilute patterns?
Zotted Zounds & Exspecto Patronus! 65 account remain! David Jacobs
continues to give details his hassle and we are put productive our own as a
result! Excelsior! The rotate continues, faster and faster, weirder
and weirder, but scarce and farther!
Faithfully reader...Ufological sensibilities empowered are the
listener's own! Subscribe!
http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
Thankfulness to Alfred Lehmberg for this post!
