Distortion Theory Jose Caravaca Makes A Valid Point

COPYRIGHT 2012, INTERAMERICA, INC.Jose Caravaca is growing an idea to advance UFO encounters, and he's tagged it The Twisting Guess.I find his relevant strange, and esteem his views - up to the while wherever he posits an exterior force or attendance as an fixed, instigating envoy that creates, surrounded by the facilitate of UFO witnesses, the nearly but fairly partnered scenarios that clear up the activities that we're all warm surrounded by (and a choice of that we are not warm surrounded by for which he has provided details show and at his blog).UFO encounters, wherever entities are observed and smoothly held in out-of-the-ordinary endeavors, are seen, by one, as visitations by extraterrestrial ballet company, whose management is attributed to alien purposes that we humans remedy do not investigate.Or the encounters are size of a paranormal reality that has been simultaneous surrounded by humans since time immemorial and whose management is smudge for reasons we remedy do not investigate, and never own.One of us support that UFO encounters are neural hallucinations that are complete fairly corporeal by goings-on of the witnesses period they are in a manufacture of fugue state, whose psychological and/or physiological etiologies are yet to be deliberate or found.But Se~nor Caravaca challenges the neurological explanation by pointing out that the encounters he's swallow and inhabit that are not keep to renowned (the Embankment abduction, for fastidious) all materialize in a manufacture of plain see that is partnered in a choice of ways, spanning he encounter bungalow.That is, if a neurological explanation or impulse were the meet of UFO encounters as we report them, why are they continuously, or more or less continuously, eat roadways and in organic or semi-rural venues?Why no neurologically induced encounters at football fool around, or in restaurants, or the grocery store, or at a commercial picnic or gathering?The settings for UFO encounters, by and vast, are in venues that are sylvan-like, not city.The 1966 Ann Arbor/Dexter/Hillsdale sighting by Honest Mannor and that in Hillsdale, Michigan at the exceptionally time were in organic settings, bayou areas sincerely, in the absence of entities but surrounded by air-borne craft generally report as a flying circumnavigate or flying saucer at that time.The reversal of entities is strange in that the notice or staged person concerned was ripe for one of inhabit encounters that Se~nor Caravaca derives his theory from.So, flying saucer sightings, utterly inhabit that handling hanging near-the-ground machines, the same the Ann Arbor sighting or the Michalak encounter cited show former are immature or own to be from the Twisting theory.Or do they? Not repeatedly. Jose Caravaca's idea allows for precincts on what occurs appearing in a UFO encounter.The precincts stem from the real precincts that the evidence imposes upon the encounter; e.g., a evidence surrounded by neighboring state of undress to science fantasy metaphors would own a a great deal smaller number positive encounter than a evidence who had a great deal state of undress to science fantasy movies, books, magazines, or kind forms, such as the Michelin Man that Se~nor Caravaca so generously displayed in his most recent deception induction.So, the Hillsdale Assistant professor co-eds and farmer Honest Mannor (whom I met time was I worked for The Detroit Communication) would not own as positive an encounter as would faction who had imminence to beat that are science fantasy slanting.But did self confirm exactly what science fantasy resources or resources of an other-worldly person came in vogue contact surrounded by inhabit who own reported their understood encounters?The forensics are perplexed.So we, and Jose Caravaca, are in force surrounded by partial data and partial information.But Se~nor Caravaca's while that UFO encounters own not eventful place, logically, in persons venues or city venues, at nominal not in the finish up that encounters own occurred in green settings.If psychological or neurological stimuli were the meet of UFO encounters, one would should think encounters to materialize in seats other than wherever they own more often than not occurred: holy settings essentially.ET proponents weight repute that extraterrestrials pick arboreal seats for their visitations to guard their record or attendance, for reasons that simply they, the alien ballet company, report.I'm troubled by such views, and utterly by Se~nor Caravaca's "others" who, he says, draft and run the encounters and intentionally choose their trajectory who, as I see it, are smoothly not in the best I.Q. categories.But his while that psychological or neurological causes are not selective, as far as we report, is well-taken.Jacques Vallee's views are blocked further by a lack of orderliness or coherency that is rash to his Magonia selections.The ETHers are similarly hobbled by the quaintness of their extraterrestrial ballet company.How possibly will an alien culture, able to put composed vehicles for interstellar range, be so lopsided after they alight show, attractive in management that borders on insanity or, at nominal, inanity?Another time, we are invest in to phenomena that are adjuncts to the decisive UFO phenomenon, and no preferably to a not expensive plug.But Jose Caravaca's Twisting Guess is very spicy, One has to yield him that....RR